tag:theregister.com,2005:feed/forum/theregister.com/2017/02/26/git_fscked_by_sha1_collision_not_so_fast_says_linus_torvalds/
The Register forum: Git <code>fsck</code>ed by SHA-1 collision? Not so fast, says Linus Torvalds
2017-12-30T17:01:05Z
Copyright © 2024, Situation Publishing Ltd.
Team Register (and a cast of thousands of forum denizens)
webmaster@theregister.co.uk
https://www.theregister.com/odds/about/contact/
https://www.theregister.com/Design/graphics/icons/favicon.png
https://www.theregister.com/Design/graphics/Reg_default/The_Register_r.png
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3383148
2017-12-30T17:01:05Z
No Title
trev.rollins https://forums.theregister.com/user/87345/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3317668
2017-10-15T22:37:02Z
xmit error
Colin Tree https://forums.theregister.com/user/17501/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3124172
2017-03-09T17:50:57Z
Re: I missed this reading the original collision notification
Naselus https://forums.theregister.com/user/71583/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3115872
2017-03-01T03:17:42Z
Re: That's not how hashes work
grim0013 https://forums.theregister.com/user/83526/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3114835
2017-02-28T09:31:28Z
Re: Good software design
Bronek Kozicki https://forums.theregister.com/user/9356/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3114433
2017-02-27T21:46:03Z
Re: Once again - try it with .TXT files
Richard 12 https://forums.theregister.com/user/32396/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3114430
2017-02-27T21:44:13Z
Re: Lifetime of Hash Algorithms
Richard 12 https://forums.theregister.com/user/32396/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3114426
2017-02-27T21:40:22Z
Re: Am I missing something here?
Anonymous Coward
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3114420
2017-02-27T21:38:01Z
Re: Context is King
Richard 12 https://forums.theregister.com/user/32396/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3114338
2017-02-27T20:06:10Z
Re: That's not how hashes work
Anonymous C0ward https://forums.theregister.com/user/56090/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3114218
2017-02-27T18:11:13Z
Re: That's not how hashes work
Anonymous Coward
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3114173
2017-02-27T17:42:32Z
"nasty people will teach him the threat model"
Pascal Monett https://forums.theregister.com/user/1881/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3114090
2017-02-27T16:44:08Z
Re: That's not how hashes work
Anonymous Coward
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3113908
2017-02-27T14:58:00Z
Re: That's not how hashes work
Tom Melly https://forums.theregister.com/user/2729/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3113894
2017-02-27T14:52:25Z
Re: I missed this reading the original collision notification
MJB7 https://forums.theregister.com/user/67974/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3113831
2017-02-27T14:18:59Z
Re: That's not how hashes work
juice https://forums.theregister.com/user/46942/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3113808
2017-02-27T14:01:39Z
Re: That's not how hashes work
badger31 https://forums.theregister.com/user/48293/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3113780
2017-02-27T13:43:19Z
Re: Lifetime of Hash Algorithms
John Sanders https://forums.theregister.com/user/413/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3113766
2017-02-27T13:33:32Z
Linus' ego
Red Bren https://forums.theregister.com/user/11261/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3113609
2017-02-27T11:41:23Z
Re: That's not how hashes work
TeeCee https://forums.theregister.com/user/10706/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3113604
2017-02-27T11:37:42Z
Re: Common sense approach
Anonymous Coward
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3113568
2017-02-27T11:12:28Z
Re: That's not how hashes work
Doctor Syntax https://forums.theregister.com/user/70687/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3113534
2017-02-27T10:40:42Z
Re: That's not how hashes work
Paul Smith https://forums.theregister.com/user/6673/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3113533
2017-02-27T10:39:01Z
Re: I missed this reading the original collision notification
Naselus https://forums.theregister.com/user/71583/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3113499
2017-02-27T10:00:52Z
No Title
Anonymous Coward
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3113496
2017-02-27T09:56:16Z
Re: SHA1 still "useful" then?
hammarbtyp https://forums.theregister.com/user/13327/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3113495
2017-02-27T09:56:09Z
No Title
gnasher729 https://forums.theregister.com/user/72212/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3113492
2017-02-27T09:52:22Z
Re: Lifetime of Hash Algorithms
Anonymous Coward
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3113491
2017-02-27T09:51:14Z
Re: Context is King
yoganmahew https://forums.theregister.com/user/69660/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3113489
2017-02-27T09:48:28Z
Re: That's not how hashes work
gnasher729 https://forums.theregister.com/user/72212/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3113487
2017-02-27T09:46:51Z
Re: Common sense approach
Anonymous Coward
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3113480
2017-02-27T09:44:52Z
Re: Am I missing something here?
Anonymous Coward
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3113442
2017-02-27T09:15:58Z
Re: Once again - try it with .TXT files
Charlie Clark https://forums.theregister.com/user/2125/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3113420
2017-02-27T08:59:18Z
Once again - try it with .TXT files
Anonymous Coward
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3113419
2017-02-27T08:56:06Z
Re: Common sense approach
Paul Crawford https://forums.theregister.com/user/1358/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3113403
2017-02-27T08:34:24Z
No Title
bolac https://forums.theregister.com/user/80553/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3113390
2017-02-27T08:18:48Z
Re: Common sense approach
9Rune5 https://forums.theregister.com/user/66637/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3113368
2017-02-27T07:40:17Z
Re: Lifetime of Hash Algorithms
John Robson https://forums.theregister.com/user/20764/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3113367
2017-02-27T07:39:11Z
The way it seems to me
Will Godfrey https://forums.theregister.com/user/9487/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3113363
2017-02-27T07:32:42Z
Re: Lifetime of Hash Algorithms
Richard 12 https://forums.theregister.com/user/32396/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3113361
2017-02-27T07:28:07Z
Context is King
Richard 12 https://forums.theregister.com/user/32396/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3113351
2017-02-27T07:09:16Z
Re: Am I missing something here?
Anonymous Coward
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3113348
2017-02-27T07:03:42Z
Re: SHA1 still "useful" then?
K.o.R https://forums.theregister.com/user/35337/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3113311
2017-02-27T03:24:23Z
Lifetime of Hash Algorithms
a_yank_lurker https://forums.theregister.com/user/67775/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3113308
2017-02-27T02:54:41Z
Am I missing something here?
Bill Gray https://forums.theregister.com/user/71406/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3113299
2017-02-27T01:44:02Z
Re: That's not how hashes work
P. Lee https://forums.theregister.com/user/13694/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3113295
2017-02-27T01:20:56Z
No Title
Lee D https://forums.theregister.com/user/62937/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3113288
2017-02-27T00:23:59Z
No Title
Anonymous Coward
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3113285
2017-02-27T00:02:52Z
For crying out loud...
Deltics https://forums.theregister.com/user/70679/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3113276
2017-02-26T23:38:28Z
Good software design
Brian Scott https://forums.theregister.com/user/5142/